| 1. Scientific
name: Balanus improvisus Darwin (Balanidae, Cirripeda)
Common name: Acorn barnacle

Photo by Jonne Kotta.
2. Identification
Shell white or grey, wall typically conical, very smooth; walls never
folded longitudinally. Shell opening diamond-shaped, slightly toothed.
Base radially calcareous, flat and thin, permeated by pores that do not
generally run to the very centre of the basal plate (Gollasch et al. 1999).
3. Natural distribution
An Atlantic, Old World or most likely American species, widely distributed
around the world but its distribution is patchy.
4. First finding in Estonia
Mid or late XIX century, exact location and time are not known.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
B. improvisus is likely to have been introduced from North America. B.
improvisus is transmitted by ships or as a fouling organism or in ballast
water (Gollasch et al. 1999). It was first found in the southeastern Baltic
in 1844, i.e. 10 years before being described by Darwin, and became common
especially in ports. The introduction of B. improvisus was so successful
that nowadays most of the Baltic Sea is colonized (Leppäkoski and
Olenin 2000).
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
Specific methods are required to estimate the population density, hence,
there are a few quantitative data about the species. Barnacle densities
have been estimated from some tens to 5000 ind. dm-2.
Extremely euryhaline, tolerates salinities from nearly 0 to 40 .
Adults live on rocky shores, boulders, pilings, buoys, ship hulls, wood,
seaweed, shells, and crustaceans. Generally inhabits the depth range from
the surface down to 6 m. Tolerant to pollution and eutrophication, preference
for organically enriched sites in ports with good foraging conditions
(filter-feeder on detritus and phytoplankton) (Gollasch et al. 1999).

Broken line shows the eastern distribution limit of B. improvisus in the
Estonian coastal sea.
7. Ecological and economical
impact
It is capable of marked habitat alteration through the construction of
dense crusts on hard surfaces and secondary hard substrates. In dense
population of B. improvisus, associated species such as chironomid larvae,
ostracods, copepods, and juvenile bivalves increased compared to adjacent
sites without crusts. The main effect of the barnacle was facilitating
settlement of other organisms (Leppäkoski and Olenin 2000).
The species is a fouling organism on ship's hulls but likely on blue mussels
and oysters. Fouling of water intake pipes and heath exchangers. Through
filter-feeding slows down eutrophication processes (Gollasch et al. 1999).
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Gollasch, S., Minchin, D., Rosenthal, H. and Voigt, M (eds.). 1999. Exotics
Across the Ocean Case Histories on Introduced Species. Department of Fishery
Biology, Institute for Marine Science, University of Kiel, Germany.
Furman, E.R. 1989. The taxonomic relationship of Balanus improvisus (Darwin)
populations in the Baltic and the Atlantic. Ph D thesis, University College
of North Wales, 136 pp.
Furman, E. 1990. Geographical variations of Balanus improvisus in biochemical
and morphometric characters. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 70: 721-740.
Leppäkoski, E. and Olenin, S. 2000. Xenodiversity of the European
brackish water seas: the North American contribution. In: Pederson, J.
(ed) Marine Bioinvasions. Proceedings of the First National Conference,
January 24-27, 1999. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 107-119.
Leppäkoski, E. and Olenin, S. 2001. The meltdown of biogeographical
peculiarities of the Baltic Sea: the interaction of natural and man-made
processes. Ambio 30: 202-209.
1. Scientific name: Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) (Dreissenidae,
Bivalvia)
Common name: Zebra mussel, Wandering mussel

Photo by Jonne Kotta.
2. Identification
Shell is triangular (height makes 0.40-0.60 of length), convex. In front
view, the dorsal margin of valves meet to from an angle about 90?. The
ventral edge is flattened with a clear byssal notch one third of its length
from apex. Umbonal ridges very prominent, almost parallel with ventral
margin. Up to 50 mm. Greenish, brownish-yellowish with clear dark and
light coloured ("zebra") zig-zag banding. Shell shape and coloration
are highly variable, depending on substrate, depth, and density of aggregation
(Gollasch et al. 1999).
3. Natural distribution
Native to the drainage basins of the Black, Caspian and Aral Sea. Introduced
to north-west Russia, central and western Europe, Scandinavia, Britain,
Ireland and North-America (Gollasch et al. 1999).
4. First finding in Estonia
Firstly the species was introduced to the estuary of Põlula River
(?) in the Gulf of Finland and Pärnu Bay in the Gulf of Riga in the
middle of the XIX century. Second introduction took place through Lake
Peipsi to the easternmost part of the Gulf of Finland in the 1930s.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
How the initial expansion from the Black Sea and Aralo-Caspian Sea took
place is largely unclear. The zebra mussel may have penetrated from the
Black Sea via Dnepr, the Oginskij Canal (completed in 1804) to the River
Neman and further to the Curonian Lagoon, SE Baltic Sea. However, it may
have come via canals from the Caspian region using the Volga and its tributaries
and lakes Onega and Ladoga. In 1990 it was reported from brackish water
in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland after being present for 150-years
in the nearby freshwater lake Ladoga (Gollasch et al. 1999).
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
There is a great amount of genetic variation within the species. This
feature may facilitate the mussel to rapidly colonize new habitats and
adapt to new environments. The high reproductive output and ability to
extend their plaktonic stage enables rapid dispersal. Larvae and adults
can be distributed in ballast water as fouling on ship and boat hulls,
navigation buoys, fishing vessel wells; industrial activities such as
transport of timber or river gravel; fisheries such as fish stocking water,
fishing equipment. The overland transport of zebra mussels by small trailered
boats has been repeatedly implicated in inner-lake dispersal (Gollasch
et al. 1999).
Nowadays, the species has been established in a few localities of the
easternmost Gulf of Finland (Valovirta and Porkka 1996, Kotta et al. 1998)
and in less saline parts of the Gulf of Riga (Kotta et al. 1998). D. polymorpha
has not been found in the Väinameri.
New findings of D. polymorpha in the coastal area of the Gulf of Finland
indicate that a slow expansion of its distribution area is currently taking
place. However, the Gulf of Finland is a relatively hostile environment
for D. polymorpha, which originates from the warmer areas. The population
seems to be unstable and the species is likely to reproduce only occasionally
in favourable years (Valovirta and Porkka 1996, Kotta et al. 1998).
D. polymorpha is relatively common everywhere in the Gulf of Riga except
in its middle part and at the southern coast of Saaremaa Island (Kotta
et al. 1998). The distribution area documented in the literature (Shurin
1953, 1961, Järvekülg 1979) is fairly consistent with recent
findings with the exception that Shurin (1961) also found a population
of D. polymorpha living on phanerogams in the southern coastal sea off
Saaremaa Island.
D. polymorpha inhabits depths down to 15 m when suitable substrate, i.e.
hard bottoms or macrovegetation with strong thalli, is present. The biomass
of D. polymorpha was significantly higher on stone bottoms followed by
vegetated and mixed bottoms. Sediment type did not contribute to the variance
of the abundance of D. polymorpha (Kotta et al. 1998).
Generally, the abundances and biomasses of the species were low, around
50 ind. m-2 and 5 g dw m-2, respectively. The values up to 8400 ind m-2
and 1400 g dw m?2 were recorded in the southernmost part of the Gulf of
Riga. This could be explained by the inflow of fresh water of the Daugava
River resulting in lower salinity and higher nutrient concentrations and,
consequently, higher phytoplankton biomass (Kotta et al. 1998).
Hence, the factors favouring the development of a dense population of
D. polymorpha are rather low salinity (< 5 psu) and high trophic conditions
(chl a values during spring bloom > 20 ?g l-1). In the areas of higher
salinity (> 5 psu) lower filtration rates set the limits of its distribution
and the species is probably outcompeted by M. edulis.

Crosses show the recent distribution area of D. polymorpha in the Estonian
coastal sea.
7. Ecological and economical impact
Owing to its large filtration capacity and mass occurrence D. polymorpha
outcompetes the native species of similar feeding type. The species slows
down the eutrophication processes, indirectly favours the blooms of blue
green algae, increases water transparency and ameliorate the conditions
for benthic macrovegetation. Through biodeposition D. polymorpha increase
the density of benthic deposit feeders.
Economic impacts are the fouling of intake pipes, ship hulls, navigational
constructions, cages of aquaculture, cuts to bathers feet, reduced angling
catches (Gollasch et al. 1999).
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Gollasch, S. and Leppäkoski, E (eds.). 1999. Initial Risk Assessment
of Alien Species in Nordic Coastal Waters. Nordic Council of Ministers,
Copenhagen.
Järvekülg, A. 1979. Benthic Fauna of the Eastern Baltic Sea.
Valgus, Tallinn (in Russian).
Kotta, J. 2000. Impact of eutrophication and biological invasions on the
structure and functions of benthic macrofauna. Dissertationes Biologicae
Universitatis Tartuensis, 63, Tartu University Press, pp. 1-160.
Kotta, J and M¸hlenberg, F. 2002. Grazing impact of Mytilus edulis
and Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) in the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea estimated
from biodeposition rates of algal pigments. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39: 151-160.
Kotta, J., Orav, H. and Kotta, I. 1998. Distribution and filtration activity
of Zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) in the Gulf of Riga and
the Gulf of Finland. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol. 47: 32-41.
Kotta, J., Orav, H. and Vuorinen, I. 2001b. In situ estimates of the seasonal
variability in the benthic-pelagic coupling of Dreissena polymorpha, Mytilus
edulis and Balanus improvisus in the NE Baltic sea. 36th European Marine
Biology Symposium. A marine science odyssey into the 21st century. Maó,
17-22.9.2001. Abstracts, 163.
Mikelsaar, N.Õ. and Vinkel, R. 1936. Uusi andmeid rändkarbi
Dreissena polymorpha Pall. esinemisest Eestis. Eesti Loodus 4: 142-145.
Orlova, M. 2002. Dreissena (D.) polymorpha: Evolutionary origin and biological
peculiarities as prerequisites of invasion success. In: Leppäkoski
et al. (eds.) Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, pp. 127-134.
Shurin, A.T. 1953. Bottom fauna in the Gulf of Riga. Tr. Latv. Odteleniya
VNIRO, 1, 77-113 (in Russian).
Shurin, A.T. 1961. The grouping of bottom fauna in the Gulf of Riga. Tr.
NIIRH SNH Latv. SSR, 3, 343-368 (in Russian).
Timm, T. 1960. Rändkarp. Eesti Loodus 4: 211-215.
Timm, T., Kangur, K., Timm, H. and Timm, V. 1996a. Macrozoobenthos of
Lake Peipsi-Pihkva: long-term biomass changes. Hydrobiologia 338: 155-162.
Timm, T., Kangur,K., Timm, H. and Timm, V. 1996b. Macrozoobenthos of Lake
Peipsi-Pihkva: taxonimical composition, abundance, biomass, and their
relation to some ecological parameters. Hydrobiologia 338: 139-154.
Timm, V. 1990. Peipsi järve suured karbid (Bivalvia). Eesti TA Toim.
Biol. 39: 46-54.
Valovirta, I. and Porkka, M. 1996. The distribution and abundance of Dreissena
polymorpha (Pallas) in the eastern Gulf of Finland. Mem. Soc. Fauna Flora
Fenn. 72: 63-78.
1. Scientific name: Eriocheir sinensis Milne-Edw. (Brachyura,
Decapoda)
Common name: Chinese Mitten Crab, Mitten Crab, Chinese Freshwater Edible
Crab

Figure in Gollasch et al. 1999.
2. Identification
The square shaped carapace of adult crabs, clearly distinguishes it from
other European brachyuran crabs. It can attain a carapace width of 5 cm.
Males have a hair-like covering on the claws forming mitten-like claws.
The colour varies from yellow to brown, rarely purple and red (Gollasch
et al. 1999).
3. Natural distribution
Areas of origin are waters in temperate and tropical regions between Vladivostock
(Russia) and South-China, including Japan and Taiwan. Centre of occurrence
is the Yellow Sea. Records outside its native regions are Europe, Mediterranean
Sea, Black Sea, Hawaii, Great Lakes and San Francisco Bay (Gollasch et
al. 1999).
4. First finding in Estonia
Adjacent to Vormsi Island, Väinameri Archipelago Sea in 1933.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
In Europe the crab was first recorded from the German river Aller in 1912
and may have been released with ballast water discharges. The species
has probably spread into the Baltic Sea via the Kiel Canal (1926) (Gollasch
et al. 1999).
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
Up to date there are little information
about the distribution and population dynamics of the crab in the Estonian
coastal sea as these knowledge are obtained only from irregular reports
of fishermen.
In general the crabs live on different types of sediment, preferring hard
bottom substrate. The species feeds on a wide variety of plants, invertebrates,
fishes and detritus. Snails and clams are the main food.
On their migrational routes crabs may be exposed to air for several hours.
7. Ecological and economical
impact
Crabs are preying upon native species and after mass occurrence may exterminate
the native species. They are competing for space and food with other species.
Burrowing activities of crabs result in damages of dikes, river banks
and port installations. Crabs feed on fishes caught in traps and nets.
Nets will be damaged. Clogging of water intake filters during mass occurrence.
In some countries the crabs are imported for human consumption. Crabs
have been used as bait for eel fishing, to produce fish meal, cosmetic
products (Gollasch et al. 1999).
The larvae of the crab develop only in marine water. Therefore a migration
is the only way of the species to colonize brackish or fresh waters. This
also explains why the species is not able to attain self-sustaining populations
in the Baltic Sea. We believe that owing to the low density of the crab
the species is likely to have little effect on the local ecosystem of
the Estonian coastal sea.
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Gollasch, S., Minchin, D., Rosenthal, H. and Voigt, M (eds.). 1999. Exotics
Across the Ocean Case Histories on Introduced Species. Department of Fishery
Biology, Institute for Marine Science, University of Kiel, Germany.
Leppäkoski, E. 1991. Introduced species - resource or threat in brackish-water
seas? Examples from the Baltic and the Black Sea. Mar. Poll. Bull. 23:
219-223.
1. Scientific name: Marenzelleria cf. viridis (Verrill)
(Polychaeta)
Common name: red gilled mud worm

Photo by Jonne Kotta.
2. Identification
Body long, worm-like without any dorsal scales. Neoropodium (ventral branch
of parapodia) bearing also short chaetae at least in some parts of body;
no shift of parapodia to dorsal side in hind body. Anterior end with various
long appendages. More than one pair of long tentacles or gills on the
anterior end. Gills beginning from the first setiger. Hooked chaetae in
both notopodia and neuropodia beginning far backwards of chaetal segments
XX. In I or I-II some hair chaetae considerably longer than the rest.
Numerous small appendages surrounding anus (Timm 1999).
3. Natural distribution
The world-wide distribution of the genus Marenzelleria is restricted to
the northern Hemisphere. The native region of M. cf. viridis is the Atlantic
coast of North-America: Currituck Sound (North Carolina), Trippe Bay (Chesapeake
Bay), Chester River (Virginia and Delaware) and Ogeechee River (Georgia)
(Gollasch et al. 1999).
4. First finding in Estonia
and adjacent waters
M. viridis was observed for the first time in the Gulf of Riga, near the
mouth of the Daugava in 1988 (Lagzdins and Pallo 1994). The following
four years the polychaete densities rose more than 100 times reaching
the values of 1400 ind m-2. In the northern part of the Gulf of Riga and
the Väinameri M. cf. viridis was found in 1995. The salinity values
were relatively stable at the beginning of the 1990s whereas average temperatures
were much higher in 1994 than in previous years. Probably, higher summer
temperature resulted in a higher reproductive output of M. cf. viridis,
which enhanced its invasion ability towards the northern part of the Gulf
of Riga and the Väinameri (Kotta and Kotta 1998).
The first observation of M. cf. viridis at the northern coast of the Gulf
of Finland was made in 1990 (Norkko et al. 1993, Stigzelius et al. 1997).
During 1990-93 M. cf. viridis expanded its distribution into the eastern
parts of the Gulf (Stigzelius et al. 1997). However, anti-clockwise circulation
of the currents would not permit M. cf. viridis to spread from the northern
side of the Gulf of Finland towards its southern side. In addition, the
larvae of the polychaete are unable to complete their development at salinities
below 5 psu (George 1966), which may frequently occur in the easternmost
part of the Gulf of Finland. Only one specimen was recorded near the Pühajõgi
River, south-eastern coast of the Gulf of Finland, in 1994. Until 1997
this polychaete was not observed along the southern coast of the Gulf
of Finland. Some occasional findings of M. cf. viridis in the westernmost
bays of the Gulf of Finland suggest the Väinameri as a donor region.
Nowadays M. cf. viridis is slowly expanding its distribution range towards
the eastern parts of the Gulf of Finland, being established as far as
in Narva Bay.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
In 1985 the first specimens of M. cf. viridis were found in the Baltic
Sea. By 1992 it occurred at several coastal areas along the Baltic Proper
up to the northern side of the Gulf of Finland. The distribution of the
species is restricted to coastal waters, estuaries and shallow bays.
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
The species is often described as motile. But its spread is often associated
with dispersal and/or long development of planktonic larvae. The transport
as larvae in the ballast water of ships is likely.
Depth does not correlate with the abundance and biomass of M. cf. viridis
but sediment type is a significant factor for both. In shallower areas
(< 10 m) M. viridis prefers sand or gravel bottoms. Its abundance is
higher in more densely vegetated areas. Deeper down (> 10 m) M. cf.
viridis is confined to silty clay bottoms.
In the Väinameri the polychaete is restricted to deeper parts of
the archipelago (7-11 m). The area is homogeneous both in terms of sediment
and macrovegetation: the sandy clay substrate is covered with a loose
layer of the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis. Among benthic invertebrates
mainly Macoma balthica, Cerastoderma glaucum and Nereis diversicolor are
found in the sediment while Mytilus edulis is more abundant in the layer
of F. lumbricalis. Higher biomass of the polychaete under the mat of F.
lumbricalis agrees with the hypothesis that uniformity of assemblage facilitates
the establishment of introduced species (Carlton, 1996). Also, it is likely
that a thick mat of F. lumbricalis protects infauna effectively from fish
predation. On the other hand, intermediate disturbance (Connel 1978) due
to possible temporary hypoxia under F. lumbricalis may be beneficial for
the establishment of opportunistic species such as M. cf. viridis.
As compared to the Latvian side of the Gulf of Riga, the abundances of
M. cf. viridis in the Estonian coastal sea are rather low, seldom surpassing
100 ind m-2. Hence, an increase in the abundances of M. cf. viridis is
expected in the coming years.

Relationship between the areal coverage of the red alga Furcellaria lubricalis
and the biomass of M. viridis.
Crosses show the recent distribution area of M. viridis in the Estonian
coastal sea.
7. Ecological and economical
impact
The polychaete is a deep burrowing deposit feeder - a new function, which
has not previously been observed in the northern Baltic Sea. We estimated
whether the appearance of the new function affected the native benthic
invertebrate communities (Kotta et al. 2001, Kotta and Olafsson 2003).
Experimental studies gave further information on that (1) the introduced
polychaete M. cf. viridis negatively influence the native polychaete species
Nereis diversicolor and the amphipod Monoporeia affinis. (2) This effect
is likely to decrease with the increasing density of adult specimens of
the bivalve M. balthica. (3) Competitive interactions between M. cf. viridis
and M. balthica appear a key factor determining the distribution pattern
of M. cf. viridis in the Baltic Sea. (4) Competitive superiority of M.
balthica over M. cf. viridis is likely due to more efficient feeding regime
of the bivalve. The pilot experiment indicated that M. balthica consumed
sedimented phytodetritus from wider surface area and its consumption rates
were higher than that of M. cf. viridis.

Schematic view of the competitive interactions between the introduced
polychaete and the native fauna in the study area.
Other known effects of M. cf. viridis are the increased benthic production,
higher burrowing activity improves the oxygen content of the sediment.
The species is a potential food source for ground living fish.
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Carlton, J.T. 1996. Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion
ecology. Biol. Conserv., 78, 97-106.
Connell, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.
Science, 199, 1302-1310.
George, J.D. 1966. Reproduction and early development of the spionid polychaete,
Scolecolepides viridis (Verrill). Biol. Bull. 130: 76-93.
Gollasch, S. and Leppäkoski, E (eds.). 1999. Initial Risk Assessment
of Alien Species in Nordic Coastal Waters. Nordic Council of Ministers,
Copenhagen.
Gollasch, S., Minchin, D., Rosenthal, H. and Voigt, M (eds.). 1999. Exotics
Across the Ocean Case Histories on Introduced Species. Department of Fishery
Biology, Institute for Marine Science, University of Kiel, Germany.
Kotta, J. 2000. Impact of eutrophication and biological invasions on the
structure and functions of benthic macrofauna. Dissertationes Biologicae
Universitatis Tartuensis, 63, Tartu University Press, pp. 1-160.
Kotta, J. and Kotta, I. 1998. Distribution and invasion ecology of Marenzelleria
viridis (Verrill) in the Estonian coastal waters. Proc. Estonian Acad.
Sci. Biol. Ecol. 47: 210-217.
Kotta, J. and Ólafsson, E. 2003. Competition for food between the
introduced exotic polychaete Marenzelleria viridis and the resident native
amphipod Monoporeia affinis in the Baltic Sea. J. Sea Res., in press.
Kotta, J. and Orav, H. 2001. Role of benthic macroalgae in regulating
macrozoobenthic assemblages in the Väinameri (north-eastern Baltic
Sea). Ann. Zool. Fennici 38: 163-171.
Kotta, J., Orav, H. and Sandberg-Kilpi, E. 2001a. Ecological consequence
of the introduction of the polychaete Marenzelleria viridis into a shallow
water biotope of the northern Baltic Sea. J. Sea Res. 46: 273-280.
Kotta, J., Simm, M., Kotta, I., Kanoðina, I., Kallaste, K. and Raid,
T. 2003. Factors controlling the long-term changes of the eutrophicated
ecosystem of Pärnu Bay, the Gulf of Riga. Hydrobiologia, in press.
Lagzdins, G. and Pallo, P. 1994. Marenzelleria viridis (Verrill) (Polychaeta,
Spionidae) - a new species for the Gulf of Riga. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci.
Biol. 43: 184-188.
Norkko, A., Bonsdorff, E. and Boström, C. 1993. Observations of the
polychaete Marenzelleria viridis (Verrill) on a shallow sandy bottom on
the South coast of Finland. Mem. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 69: 112-113.
Stigzelius, J., Laine, A., Rissanen, J., Andersin, A.-B. and Ilus, E.
1997. The introduction of Marenzelleria viridis (Polychaeta, Spionidae)
into the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Bothnia (northern Baltic Sea).
Ann. Zool. Fenn. 34: 205-212.
Timm, T. 1999. Eesti rõngusside määraja. Teaduste Akadeemia
Kirjastus, Tartu.
Zettler, 1997. Bibliography on the genus Marenzelleria and its geographical
distribution, principal topics and nomenclature. Aq. Ecol. 31: 233-258.
Zettler, M.L., Daunys, D., Kotta, J. and Bick, A. 2002. History and success
of an invasion into the Baltic: the case of the polychaete worm Marenzelleria
cf. viridis, development and strategies. In: Leppäkoski, E., S. Gollasch
and S. Olenin (eds.), Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe - Distributions,
Impacts and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 66-75.
1. Scientific name: Mya arenaria L. (Bivalvia)
Common name: the soft shell clam, sand gaper

Photo by Jonne Kotta.
2. Identification
Oval, umbones just posterior to mid-line, anterior regularly rounded,
posterior somewhat tapered. Up to 150 mm long. Off-white, yellowish, or
fawn, dark greyish-brown about the umbones; periostracum light brown,
often stained by iron deposits. Left valve with a prominent spatulate
chondrophore, projecting at a right angle to hinge line, with a distinct
tooth-like ridge along its posterior edge. Right valve with a concave,
spatulate chondrophore recessed beneath umbo (Hayward and Ryland 1995).
3. Natural distribution
In sand, often mixed with mud or gravel, lower shore and offshore to about
20 m. Often very common in estuaries, where it may occur in extensive
beds. Circumboreal, not reaching the Mediterranean (Hayward and Ryland
1995).
4. First finding in Estonia
Not known.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
Characteristically, the recent stage (since ca 500 BP) of the Baltic Sea
has been described as the "Mya Sea" decades before the status
of the nominator species was recognized as a globally successful marine
invader from North America, probably transported by the Vikings in the
13th century (Leppäkoski and Olenin 2001). Within the Baltic Sea
the further range expansion took place through pelagic dispersal of larvae.
Although the invasion history of M. arenaria in the Baltic Sea is not
known, this species is known as one of the most common shallow-water molluscs
of western Europe and as a naturalized species in the most of the Baltic
Sea. Its impact in the Baltic Sea has been benign (Leppäkoski and
Olenin 2000).
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
M. arenaria is widely distributed bivalve species in the whole Estonian
coastal sea. It often plays a dominating role in local benthic communities.
M. arenaria has a broad spectrum of habitat and food preference. It is
found in soft sea bottoms ranging from hard, stony sand to pure mud. Although
it may be more abundant in some substrates than in others, the type of
soil seems to have little influence on the presence or absence of M. arenaria.
Apparently, the only requirement are substrates loose enough for M. arenaria
to dig in and yet stable enough to prevent their burrows from being destroyed
too frequently (Strasser 1999).
M. arenaria tolerates a wide range of salinities and temperatures and
has high resistance to the presence of H2S and to O2 deficiency. The lowest
mean salinity tolerance of M. arenaria is 4.5-5 in the northern
Baltic Sea. Under natural conditions M. arenaria tolerates water temperatures
down to -2?C. However, exceptionally severe winters may cause substantial
mortality. The critical upper temperature is about 28 ?C (Strasser 1999).

Broken line shows the eastern distribution limit of M. arenaria in the
Estonian coastal sea.
7. Ecological and economical
impact
The effects of M. arenaria on the sublittoral community ecology are many
and varied. It acts as an effective biofilter utilizing the increased
resources of particulate organic matter, which have increased due to eutrophication
(Leppäkoski and Olenin 2000). M. arenaria shows high niche overlap
with other common bivalves. For instance, they all rely on the same food
source, most of them spawn roughly at the same time, and the early stages
are heavily preyed upon by the same set of predators. No information is
available on the effects of M. arenaria on the native communities immediately
after its invasion several hundred years ago. Today no negative effects
on other species have been observed (Strasser 1999). M. arenaria also
produces a great quantity of planktonic larvae, which forms a food basis
for fish. Mya shells entered sedimentary processes changing the granulomentry
and chemistry of the sediment (Leppäkoski and Olenin 2000).
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Kotta, I. and Kotta, J. 1997. Changes in zoobenthic communities in Estonian
waters between the 1970´s and 1990´s. An example from the
southern coast of Saaremaa and Muuga Bay. In: Proceedings of the 14th
Baltic Marine Biologists Symposium (Ojaveer, E., ed.). Estonian Academy
Publishers, Pärnu, Estonia, pp. 70-79.
Kotta, J. 2000. Impact of eutrophication and biological invasions on the
structure and functions of benthic macrofauna. Dissertationes Biologicae
Universitatis Tartuensis, 63, Tartu University Press, pp. 1-160.
Kotta, J. and Orav, H. 2001. Role of benthic macroalgae in regulating
macrozoobenthic assemblages in the Väinameri (north-eastern Baltic
Sea). Ann. Zool. Fennici 38: 163-171.
Leppäkoski, E. and Olenin, S. 2000. Xenodiversity of the European
brackish water seas: the North American contribution. In: Pederson, J.
(ed) Marine Bioinvasions. Proceedings of the First National Conference,
January 24-27, 1999. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 107-119.
Leppäkoski, E. and Olenin, S. 2001. The meltdown of biogeographical
peculiarities of the Baltic Sea: the interaction of natural and man-made
processes. Ambio 30: 202-209.
Strasser, M., 1999. Mya arenaria - an ancient invader of the North Sea
coast. Helgoländer Meresunters. 52: 309-324.
1. Scientific name: Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray) (Gastropoda,
Hydrobiidae)
Common name: Jenkin's spire shell

Photo by Jonne Kotta.
2. Identification
With six tumid whorls, often encrusted with black deposit. Last whorl
large; aperture ear-shaped or oval; inner lip occludes umbilicus. Some
shells, notably from brackish water populations, have a spiral keel, with
or without periostracal bristles; some have a spiral row of bristles but
lack keel. Beneath black encrustations shell is pale horn colour. Up to
6 ´ 3 mm. Snout evenly and darkly pigmented, with pale transverse
band anteriorly. Cephalic tentacles pale with darker base; mantle edge
without pallial tentacle (Hayward and Ryland 1995).
3. Natural distribution
Native to New Zealand but is widespread throughout eastern Australia and
Europe. Since 1987 P. antipodarum has been found in North America. Common
in freshwater and brackish (< 16) habitats, often with Hydrobia
ventrosa in the latter. Most population comprise females only, which reproduce
parthenogenetically, and males are rare. Widely distributed throughout
Europe (Hayward and Ryland 1995).
4. First finding in Estonia
Late XIX century.
5. Invasion history in the
Baltic Sea
Late XIX century via ship traffic.
6. Distribution and population
dynamics
Established populations are located in the sea areas adjacent to ports
and river estuaries. Very dense populations are found in Tallinn and Kolga
bays, middle Gulf of Finland and in the southern coastal sea of Saaremaa
Island and Pärnu Bay, northeastern Gulf of Riga. The densities may
reach to 37,000 ind. m-2.
The snail inhabits mainly sandy, gravel bottoms but likewise filamentous
green algae (Cladophora glomerata) and attached aquatic macrophytes. It
can successfully exploit both eutrophic and nonpolluted waters.

Crosses show the recent distribution area of P. antipodarum in the Estonian
coastal sea.
7. Ecological and economical impact
Resource competition with native molluscs.
8. More information
Jonne Kotta, e-mail: jonne@klab.envir.ee
9. References
Hayward, P. J. and Ryland, J.
S. 1995. Handbook of the marine fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford Univeristy
Press, New York.
Järvekülg, A. 1970. Väinamere põhjaloomastik. In:
Kumari, E. (ed) Lääne-Eesti rannikualade loodus. Loodusuurijate
selts, Valgus, Tallinn.
Järvekülg, A. and Veldre, I. 1963. Elu Läänemeres.
Eesti Riiklik Kirjastus, Tallinn.
Kotta, I. and Kotta, J. 1997. Changes in zoobenthic communities in Estonian
waters between the 1970´s and 1990´s. An example from the
southern coast of Saaremaa and Muuga Bay. In: Proceedings of the 14th
Baltic Marine Biologists Symposium (Ojaveer, E., ed.). Estonian Academy
Publishers, Pärnu, Estonia, pp. 70-79.
|